<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multilink PPP over Frame Relay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ali</title>
		<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cisco-network.com/uncategorized/multiple-ppp-over-frame-relay/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>but what should be the configuration on frame relay as you mentioned the ppp over ethernet loadbalancing. thank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what should be the configuration on frame relay as you mentioned the ppp over ethernet loadbalancing. thank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surinder</title>
		<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>surinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cisco-network.com/uncategorized/multiple-ppp-over-frame-relay/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>i did exactly same for two 256kbps lines on frame relay.
but i am have too much packet delay.

Do you have any solution for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i did exactly same for two 256kbps lines on frame relay.<br />
but i am have too much packet delay.</p>
<p>Do you have any solution for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoopy</title>
		<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>snoopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cisco-network.com/uncategorized/multiple-ppp-over-frame-relay/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>What did you do for your policy maps? According to the Cisco documentation, policy maps are required: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_fr_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

Do you have your policy map configuration available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did you do for your policy maps? According to the Cisco documentation, policy maps are required: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_fr_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/mlppp_over_fr_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html</a></p>
<p>Do you have your policy map configuration available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MustafaAksu</title>
		<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>MustafaAksu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cisco-network.com/uncategorized/multiple-ppp-over-frame-relay/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>There was a financial reason. Cost of frame relay is less than leased lines. And I didn&#039;t have an option like G.SHDSL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a financial reason. Cost of frame relay is less than leased lines. And I didn&#8217;t have an option like G.SHDSL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdave</title>
		<link>http://cisco-network.com/hands-on/multilink-ppp-over-frame-relay/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>superdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cisco-network.com/uncategorized/multiple-ppp-over-frame-relay/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I was curious.., Was there a technical reason why frame-relay was chosen for this implementation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious.., Was there a technical reason why frame-relay was chosen for this implementation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

